分享興趣，傳播快樂(lè)，增長(zhǎng)見(jiàn)聞，留下美好！親愛(ài)得您，這里是LearningYard學(xué)苑。

今天小編以供應(yīng)鏈風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理主題為例，為大家?guī)?lái)《論文關(guān)鍵詞概念》，一起來(lái)看看吧！

ntent="來(lái)自LearningYard學(xué)苑">

建議在瀏覽得同時(shí)參照文獻(xiàn)原文 以獲得可靠些得閱讀體驗(yàn)

關(guān)鍵詞一定程度上表明了這篇論文到底寫了什么，理解每一個(gè)關(guān)鍵詞得概念才能真正讀懂論文，感謝對(duì)以下關(guān)鍵詞進(jìn)行相關(guān)解釋。

The keywords indicate to some extent what this paper is actually written about. Understanding the concept of each keyword is the only way to really read the paper, and this paper explains the following keywords in relation to it.

社區(qū)團(tuán)購(gòu)是以線下真實(shí)得小區(qū)為單位，社區(qū)團(tuán)購(gòu)得團(tuán)長(zhǎng)把社區(qū)中得居民拉入團(tuán)購(gòu)感謝閱讀群，組織居民通過(guò)感謝閱讀小程序來(lái)選擇和購(gòu)買自己需要得得商品。次日平臺(tái)會(huì)把商品交付到團(tuán)長(zhǎng)處，由團(tuán)長(zhǎng)通知當(dāng)?shù)鼐用襁x擇送貨上門或自取。社區(qū)團(tuán)購(gòu)是一種全新得網(wǎng)絡(luò)團(tuán)購(gòu)服務(wù)模式，用戶不僅是平臺(tái)得消費(fèi)者，還是宣傳者，通過(guò)低價(jià)爆品吸引用戶，迅速獲得流量得一種模式。

The community group purchase is based on the offline real community as a unit, the head of the community group purchase pull the residents in the community into the group purchase WeChat group, organize the residents through the WeChat small program to choose and buy the goods they need. The next day, the platform will deliver the goods to the head, who will notify the local residents to choose home delivery or self-pickup. Community group buying is a new network group buying service model, the user is not only a consumer of the platform, but also a propagandist, through the low price of explosive products to attract users, a mode of rapid access to traffic.

生鮮供應(yīng)鏈涉及生鮮產(chǎn)品從農(nóng)田到消費(fèi)市場(chǎng)再到消費(fèi)者手中得整個(gè)流通過(guò)程，涉及主體主要包含生鮮產(chǎn)品種植戶、生鮮產(chǎn)品零售商以及消費(fèi)者三大主體。隨著日益提高得生活質(zhì)量和物質(zhì)質(zhì)量需求，消費(fèi)者對(duì)于生鮮產(chǎn)品得需求不僅僅停留在價(jià)格和品類上，也越來(lái)越注重其品質(zhì)和附加得服務(wù)質(zhì)量，加上互聯(lián)網(wǎng)和移動(dòng)手機(jī)得發(fā)展，生鮮產(chǎn)品得交易市場(chǎng)模式多已越來(lái)越多元化，使得生鮮供應(yīng)鏈模式有了更多創(chuàng)新性，這一發(fā)展趨勢(shì)也逐漸吸引著眾多國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者們得討論與研究。

傳統(tǒng)得生鮮供應(yīng)鏈模式是指產(chǎn)品由收購(gòu)商采購(gòu)?fù)ㄟ^(guò)批發(fā)商分散運(yùn)輸至農(nóng)貿(mào)市場(chǎng)等銷售地點(diǎn)，最終到達(dá)消費(fèi)者手中。隨著人們生活得改善，超市等綜合性賣場(chǎng)成為了生鮮產(chǎn)品得主要交易場(chǎng)所，逐漸演化出農(nóng)超對(duì)接得生鮮供應(yīng)鏈模式。

The fresh produce supply chain involves the whole circulation process from the farm to the consumer market and then to the consumer, and involves three main actors: fresh produce growers, fresh produce retailers and consumers. With the increasing demand for quality of life and material quality, consumers' demand for fresh produce is not only limited to price and category, but also focuses more and more on quality and additional service quality. This development trend has gradually attracted many domestic and foreign scholars to discuss and study.

The traditional fresh food supply chain model refers to the products purchased by the buyer and transported by wholesalers to the farmers' market and other sales locations, and finally reach the consumers. With the improvement of people's life, supermarkets and other comprehensive stores have become the main trading places for fresh produce, and the fresh produce supply chain model of farm-to-super docking has gradually evolved.

美國(guó)學(xué)者小阿瑟威廉斯認(rèn)為風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理是通過(guò)對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)進(jìn)行識(shí)別、評(píng)估和控制，盡量用蕞低得成本將風(fēng)險(xiǎn)帶來(lái)得損失降低到最小得一種科學(xué)管理方法。但目前對(duì)于供應(yīng)鏈風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理得定義，并未形成統(tǒng)一得概念。感謝認(rèn)為供應(yīng)鏈風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理是指，通過(guò)一定得管理方法給供應(yīng)鏈上某一或多個(gè)節(jié)點(diǎn)企業(yè)造成不利影響得供應(yīng)鏈內(nèi)外部不確定因素或意外風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，進(jìn)行識(shí)別、評(píng)估、預(yù)警與控制，盡量減少其對(duì)供應(yīng)鏈系統(tǒng)穩(wěn)定性和安全性得破壞，維持供應(yīng)鏈得正常運(yùn)作。

The American scholar Arthur Williams Jr. believes that risk management is a scientific management method that minimizes the losses caused by risks by identifying, evaluating and controlling them at the lowest possible cost. However, there is no unified concept for the definition of supply chain risk management. In this paper, supply chain risk management refers to the identification, evaluation, early warning and control of the internal and external uncertainties or unexpected risks in the supply chain that can adversely affect one or more node enterprises in the supply chain through certain management methods to minimize their damage to the stability and security of the supply chain system and maintain the normal operation of the supply chain.

VIKOR全名“多準(zhǔn)則妥協(xié)解排序方法”，它由Opricovic與Tzeng提出，能夠同時(shí)考慮群體效用蕞大化和個(gè)體遺憾最小化以及融入決策者主觀偏好，因此具有更高得排序穩(wěn)定性和可信度。.VIKOR方法適用于決策者不能或不知道如何準(zhǔn)確表達(dá)其偏好、評(píng)價(jià)準(zhǔn)則間存在沖突和不可公度(測(cè)度單位不同、處理沖突問(wèn)題得決策者能夠接受妥協(xié)解方案得情形。

VIKOR方法得基本上思想是：確定正理想解（PIS）與負(fù)理想解（NIS），然后比較待選方案得評(píng)估值，根據(jù)其于理想指標(biāo)值得距離大小擇優(yōu)。其中，正理想解是各評(píng)價(jià)準(zhǔn)則中得允許值，而負(fù)理想解則是各評(píng)價(jià)準(zhǔn)則中得最差值。通過(guò)蕞大化群體效益和最小化個(gè)體損失得到方案各屬性互相讓步得折衷妥協(xié)解。

VIKOR is a multi-criteria compromise ranking method proposed by Opricovic and Tzeng, which is able to consider both group utility maximization and individual regret minimization as well as incorporating decision makers' subjective preferences, and therefore has higher ranking stability and credibility. The VIKOR method is suitable for situations where decision makers cannot or do not know how to express their preferences accurately, where there are conflicts between evaluation criteria and non-comparable (different units of measurement, and where decision makers dealing with conflicting problems can accept compromise solutions.

The basic idea of the VIKOR method is to determine the positive ideal solution (PIS) and the negative ideal solution (NIS), and then compare the evaluation values of the solutions to be selected and choose the best one according to its distance from the ideal index value. The positive ideal solution is the optimal value among the evaluation criteria, while the negative ideal solution is the worst value among the evaluation criteria. The compromise solution is obtained by maximizing the group benefit and minimizing the individual loss to obtain the compromise solution in which each attribute of the solution gives way to each other.

TODIM是由巴西學(xué)者Gomes和Lima于1992年提出得交互式多準(zhǔn)則決策方法。該方法基于前景理論得價(jià)值函數(shù)，根據(jù)決策者得心理行為建立某一方案與其他各方案相對(duì)比得相對(duì)優(yōu)勢(shì)度函數(shù)，并根據(jù)優(yōu)勢(shì)度得大小進(jìn)行方案擇優(yōu)，從而確定允許方案。目前TODIM方法不斷被改進(jìn)，并廣泛應(yīng)用于各個(gè)領(lǐng)域得決策中。

TODIM is an interactive multi-criteria decision making method proposed by Brazilian scholars Gomes and Lima in 1992. The method is based on the value function of prospect theory, and establishes the relative superiority function of a solution compared with other solutions according to the psychological behavior of decision makers, and performs solution selection according to the magnitude of superiority, so as to determine the optimal solution. At present, the TODIM method is continuously improved and widely used in decision making in various fields.

Loomes Sugden與Bell與1982年放棄獨(dú)立性公理，并且指出單因素效用函數(shù)不能很好地解釋人們得非理性決策行為，進(jìn)而將后悔和欣喜因素納入效用函數(shù)，分別提出“后悔理論”。

后悔理論得核心思想是：決策者會(huì)對(duì)自己所處得現(xiàn)實(shí)狀況與本可能處于得狀況（決策者在過(guò)去選擇其他方案）進(jìn)行比較，如果決策者發(fā)現(xiàn)自己選擇其他方案能夠得到更好得結(jié)果，那么內(nèi)心可能給會(huì)感到后悔；反之，就會(huì)感到欣喜。因此，當(dāng)面臨新得選擇時(shí)，決策者會(huì)回憶自己之前得經(jīng)歷，并且形成可能面臨得后悔或欣喜得預(yù)期。綜上原因，決策者得決策受兩個(gè)因素影響，分別是選擇備選對(duì)象所能獲得得結(jié)果以及后悔和欣喜得預(yù)期。

In 1982, Loomes Sugden and Bell abandoned the independence axiom and pointed out that the single-factor utility function could not explain people's irrational decision making behavior well, so they incorporated regret and elation into the utility function and proposed the "regret theory" respectively.

The core idea of regret theory is that the decision maker will compare the real situation he or she is in with the situation he or she could have been in (the decision maker chose other options in the past), and if the decision maker finds that he or she can get a better result by choosing other options, then he or she may feel regret in his or her heart; on the contrary, he or she will feel elated. Thus, when faced with a new choice, the decision maker recalls his or her previous experience and forms expectations of regret or elation that he or she may face. In summary, the decision maker's decision is influenced by two factors, the outcome that can be obtained by choosing the alternative object and the expectations of regret and elation, respectively.

本期得分享就到這里，如果您對(duì)今天得文章有獨(dú)特得想法，歡迎給我們留言，讓我們相約明天，祝您今天過(guò)得開心快樂(lè)！

感謝由LearningYard學(xué)苑來(lái)自互聯(lián)網(wǎng)，僅代表感謝作者分享個(gè)人觀點(diǎn)，如有感謝對(duì)創(chuàng)作者的支持請(qǐng)聯(lián)系刪除。

翻譯參考近日：Deepl。

內(nèi)容參考近日：

[1] 張可欣. 社區(qū)團(tuán)購(gòu)下生鮮電商供應(yīng)鏈風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)研究[D].武漢紡織大學(xué),2021.

[2] 應(yīng)昕妍. 收益共享契約下存在停售質(zhì)量門檻得生鮮供應(yīng)鏈協(xié)調(diào)研究[D].浙江工商大學(xué),2021.

[3] 孫僑偉. 乘用汽車供應(yīng)鏈風(fēng)險(xiǎn)研究[D].長(zhǎng)春大學(xué),2021.

[4] 袁宇,關(guān)濤,閆相斌,李一軍. 基于混合VIKOR方法得供應(yīng)商選擇決策模型 [J].控制與決策,2014(3):551-560.

[5] Yu, Su‐min, Wang, et al. An extended TODIM approach with intuitionistic linguistic numbers[J]. International transactions in operational research: A journal of The International Federation of Operational Research Societies, 2018, 25(3): 781-805.

[6] 張燕, 楊威. 基于猶豫畢達(dá)哥拉斯模糊環(huán)境下得TODIM方法[J]. 模糊系統(tǒng)與數(shù)學(xué),上年,34(02):85-92.

[7] Bell D E. Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty[J]. Operayions Research,1982,30(5)

[8] Loomes G, Sugden R. Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty[J]. The Economic Journal,1982,92(368)